Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
marco1475
The linked article is wrong about one thing though: whether or not the loss is considered an “act of God” is irrelevant. We talked about this back in our post on Thor, where we noted that “act of God” provisions are typically part of contracts other than insuring agreements, because insuring agreements are specifically intended to cover what would count as “acts of God,” i.e., lightning strikes, floods, fires, etc.
The Avengers: Who’s Gonna Pay for That? | Law and the Multiverse

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl